Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Fourtech

Ecsta HS52

ION FlexClimate

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

10

1

3

Best position

#11

#2

#1

#2

Average position

17.0

6.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2021

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

109

27

66

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Viking Fourtech

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Snow

Confidence

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Costs

Confidence

Viking Fourtech

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Confidence

Viking Fourtech

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Confidence

Viking Fourtech

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Viking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue 4 Season

Viking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Fourtech

Ecsta HS52

ION FlexClimate

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison