Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Fourtech

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

5

10

4

5

Best position

#11

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

6.0

3.3

2.8

Latest test

2021

2026

Available sizes

32

109

40

139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Viking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue 4 Season

Viking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Fourtech

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison