18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
10
5
4
3
28
Best position
#11
#2
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
6.0
2.2
3.3
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
109
63
40
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store