18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
10
6
1
4
3
Best position
#11
#2
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
17.0
6.0
4.7
1.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
32
109
146
66
40
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Snow
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
71%
Costs
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dry
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Comfort
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store