18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
10
6
4
1
3
Best position
#11
#2
#3
#2
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
6.0
4.7
3.3
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
109
146
40
66
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Snow
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
71%
Costs
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Comfort
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store