Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Hankook

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fourtech

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance 3

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

5

1

3

4

24

28

Best position

#11

#1

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

1.0

3.7

3.3

2.7

2.3

Latest test

2021

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

32

27

36

40

302

68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

61%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

81%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

64%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

76%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Viking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue 4 Season

Viking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Fourtech

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance 3

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison