18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Number of tests
5
4
3
3
29
Best position
#11
#2
#4
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
3.3
4.3
3.7
3.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
40
99
36
180

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Costs
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Comfort
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Dry
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store