18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Vredestein
Quatrac
Number of tests
5
18
5
4
3
16
Best position
#11
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
6.1
2.2
3.3
3.7
3.1
Latest test
2021
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
47
63
40
36
88

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Vredestein Quatrac
87%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Vredestein Quatrac
74%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Vredestein Quatrac
83%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Vredestein Quatrac
67%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Vredestein Quatrac
56%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Vredestein Quatrac
64%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Vredestein Quatrac
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Vredestein Quatrac
78%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison