18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
18
6
4
1
5
3
Best position
#11
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
1.0
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2021
2024
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
47
146
40
66
63
36

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison