18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
18
6
4
28
1
Best position
#11
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
6.1
4.7
3.3
2.3
1.0
Latest test
2021
2024
2026
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
32
47
146
40
67
66

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison