18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
18
3
4
5
28
Best position
#11
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
6.1
3.7
3.3
2.8
2.3
Latest test
2021
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
32
47
36
40
139
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store