18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Ceat
WinterDrive
Hankook
ION Evo
Dunlop
Winter
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
18
4
1
2
3
Best position
#11
#1
#10
#1
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
6.1
17.0
1.0
1.5
3.7
Latest test
2021
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
47
37
66
66
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Ceat WinterDrive
43%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Ceat WinterDrive
50%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Ceat WinterDrive
55%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Ceat WinterDrive
51%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Ceat WinterDrive
34%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Ceat WinterDrive
27%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Snow
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
71%
Ceat WinterDrive
67%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Costs
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Ceat WinterDrive
50%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Ceat WinterDrive
65%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Ceat WinterDrive
1%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Ceat WinterDrive
92%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dry
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Comfort
Confidence
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Ceat WinterDrive
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store