18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
5
18
14
5
3
5
Best position
#11
#1
#8
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
6.1
13.4
2.2
3.7
2.8
Latest test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
47
153
63
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store