18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7


Today's Tyre comparison focuses on two prominent models - the Viking Fourtech and the Firestone Multiseason 2. We will critically assess strengths and weaknesses based on test results, offering a comprehensive verdict on which tyre outperforms the other.


Let's start with the Viking Fourtech, a tyre from Viking known for its distinct allround feature. Our rating for this tyre stands at 45%, with top placements in tests regarding "Aquaplaning - cross" and "Rolling resistance". However, its overall test position of 21 out of 32 tyres in the Autobild test reveals an area for enhancement.


On the other hand, we have the Multiseason 2, a winter tyre from Firestone. Made in Italy, this tyre exceeds the Viking Fourtech in our rating, sitting at a comfortable 58%. Firestone Multiseason 2 secured 6th position in the same Autobild test, significantly outperforming its competitor. It obtained the best scores for "Price/value" and "Snow traction".


Further exploration from Autobild 2020 for the Firestone Multiseason 2 offers a text summary providing a more in-depth review. The tyre showcases good traction and short brake distances on snow, dynamic wet handling, short dry brake distances, high mileage, and a great price-performance ratio. Nonetheless, its drawbacks lie in average safety reserves in Aquaplaning.


In conclusion, the Firestone Multiseason 2 delivers stellar performance, outshining the Viking Fourtech. With its higher rating, better test position, and numerous positive test features, the Multiseason 2 stands out as a top choice. However, both tyres carry unique standpoints and can serve different user needs. The Viking Fourtech offers an exceptional 'allround' experience while the Multiseason 2 is devised for optimized winter performance.


Neither of these models has been replaced by a newer version, thus their links remain unchanged. You can discover more about each tyre by following their respective links. Remember, the right tyre depends on your individual needs and priorities, so it is essential to consider these aspects during your choice.

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
13
1
3
3
26
Best position
#11
#6
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
10.9
1.0
3.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
61
27
40
34
66

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison