18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV


Today's Tyre comparison focuses on two prominent models - the Viking Fourtech and the Firestone Multiseason 2. We will critically assess strengths and weaknesses based on test results, offering a comprehensive verdict on which tyre outperforms the other.


Let's start with the Viking Fourtech, a tyre from Viking known for its distinct allround feature. Our rating for this tyre stands at 45%, with top placements in tests regarding "Aquaplaning - cross" and "Rolling resistance". However, its overall test position of 21 out of 32 tyres in the Autobild test reveals an area for enhancement.


On the other hand, we have the Multiseason 2, a winter tyre from Firestone. Made in Italy, this tyre exceeds the Viking Fourtech in our rating, sitting at a comfortable 58%. Firestone Multiseason 2 secured 6th position in the same Autobild test, significantly outperforming its competitor. It obtained the best scores for "Price/value" and "Snow traction".


Further exploration from Autobild 2020 for the Firestone Multiseason 2 offers a text summary providing a more in-depth review. The tyre showcases good traction and short brake distances on snow, dynamic wet handling, short dry brake distances, high mileage, and a great price-performance ratio. Nonetheless, its drawbacks lie in average safety reserves in Aquaplaning.


In conclusion, the Firestone Multiseason 2 delivers stellar performance, outshining the Viking Fourtech. With its higher rating, better test position, and numerous positive test features, the Multiseason 2 stands out as a top choice. However, both tyres carry unique standpoints and can serve different user needs. The Viking Fourtech offers an exceptional 'allround' experience while the Multiseason 2 is devised for optimized winter performance.


Neither of these models has been replaced by a newer version, thus their links remain unchanged. You can discover more about each tyre by following their respective links. Remember, the right tyre depends on your individual needs and priorities, so it is essential to consider these aspects during your choice.

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
5
13
1
3
24
5
Best position
#11
#6
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
10.9
1.0
3.7
2.7
2.2
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
61
27
34
151
63

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Firestone Multiseason 2
70%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison