18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Firestone
Multiseason 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
13
4
1
6
28
Best position
#11
#6
#2
#1
#3
#1
Average position
17.0
10.9
3.3
1.0
4.7
2.3
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
32
61
40
27
146
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
48%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Firestone Multiseason 2
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Firestone Multiseason 2
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Firestone Multiseason 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Multiseason 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Multiseason 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Firestone Multiseason 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store