18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
3
5
4
1
28
Best position
#11
#2
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
3.7
2.2
3.3
1.0
2.3
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
36
63
40
27
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store