18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
5
3
14
4
24
Best position
#11
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
3.7
3.6
3.3
2.7
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
32
36
194
40
302

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store