18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
CST
Medallion MD-A1
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
2
1
3
1
Best position
#11
#10
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
21.5
1.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2021
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
264
66
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store