18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
CST
Medallion MD-A1
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Number of tests
5
2
3
Best position
#11
#10
#5
Average position
17.0
21.5
7.3
Latest test
2021
2019
2025
Available sizes
32
264
59

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison