18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
CST
Medallion MD-A1
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
2
3
1
Best position
#11
#10
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
21.5
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2021
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
264
36
66

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store