Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Budget

CST

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Fourtech

Medallion MD-A1

Advantage

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

5

2

14

3

5

Best position

#11

#10

#8

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

21.5

13.4

3.7

2.8

Latest test

2021

2019

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

32

264

153

36

139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

CST Medallion MD-A1

29%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

CST Medallion MD-A1

24%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

CST Medallion MD-A1

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

CST Medallion MD-A1

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

CST Medallion MD-A1

99%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

CST Medallion MD-A1

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

CST Medallion MD-A1

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

CST Medallion MD-A1

22%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

CST Medallion MD-A1

95%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Viking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue 4 Season

Viking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs Maxxis Premitra HP5

CST Medallion MD-A1 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Fourtech

Medallion MD-A1

Advantage

e.Ziex

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison