18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
CST
Medallion MD-A1
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
5
2
14
Best position
#11
#10
#8
Average position
17.0
21.5
13.4
Latest test
2021
2019
2026
Available sizes
32
264
153

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
CST Medallion MD-A1
24%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison