18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
5
17
4
2
14
Best position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
1.7
3.3
2.0
3.6
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
80
40
48
194

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison