18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
5
14
4
1
3
24
Best position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
3.6
3.3
1.0
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
194
40
27
36
302

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
81%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
61%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison