Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Fourtech

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

5

14

10

3

Best position

#11

#8

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

13.4

6.0

1.3

Latest test

2021

2026

Available sizes

32

153

109

23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Viking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue 4 Season

Viking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Fourtech

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison