Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Fourtech

Advantage

Ventus Prime 4

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

5

14

5

Best position

#11

#8

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

13.4

6.3

2.8

Latest test

2021

2026

Available sizes

32

153

532

139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

88%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

91%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

94%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

74%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

78%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

72%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

84%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

66%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

89%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

86%

Hankook Ventus Evo

85%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

93%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Viking Fourtech vs Maxxis Mecotra 3

Viking Fourtech vs Nexen N blue 4 Season

Viking Fourtech vs Laufenn I FIT LW31

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Browse by brand

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Fourtech

Advantage

Ventus Prime 4

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison