18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
14
6
5
4
28
Best position
#11
#8
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
13.4
4.7
2.2
3.3
2.3
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
32
153
146
63
40
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store