18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season vs. Ceat WinterDrive

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage SUV All Season
Ceat
WinterDrive
Number of tests
5
1
4
Best position
#11
#2
#10
Average position
17.0
2.0
17.0
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
36
37

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
91%
Ceat WinterDrive
43%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
98%
Ceat WinterDrive
34%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
98%
Ceat WinterDrive
27%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
80%
Ceat WinterDrive
50%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
92%
Ceat WinterDrive
67%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
92%
Ceat WinterDrive
64%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
92%
Ceat WinterDrive
60%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
100%
Ceat WinterDrive
50%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
98%
Ceat WinterDrive
78%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
100%
Ceat WinterDrive
73%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage SUV All Season
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison