18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
19
4
5
3
14
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
11.2
3.3
2.8
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
76
40
139
36
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Wet braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet circle cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet performance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Snow
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Costs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Mileage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Rolling resistance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Price/value
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Ice
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store