18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
19
4
3
14
5
Best position
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.2
3.3
3.7
3.6
2.8
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
76
40
36
194
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet performance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Snow
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Costs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Ice
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store