18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
19
18
4
3
1
28
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.2
6.1
3.3
3.7
1.0
2.3
Latest test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
76
47
40
36
66
67

Wet

Wet
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet circle cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Snow

Snow
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Snow handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Snow traction
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Snow braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%

Costs

Costs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Mileage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Price/value
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%

Dry

Dry
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%

Ice

Ice
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison