18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
19
18
4
3
17
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
11.2
6.1
3.3
3.7
1.7
Latest test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
76
47
40
36
80

Wet

Wet
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Wet circle cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Snow

Snow
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow traction
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Costs

Costs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Mileage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Rolling resistance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Price/value
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Exterior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Interior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Dry

Dry
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dry handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Ice

Ice
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison