Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Upper-middle

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

MS plus 77

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterContact TS 870

Number of tests

19

3

4

23

17

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

11.2

3.7

3.3

1.7

Latest test

2021

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

76

36

40

176

80

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Wet handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Wet braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Aquaplaning - cross

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

Wet circle cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

95%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Snow

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Snow handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Snow traction

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

88%

Snow braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Snow cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Costs

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Mileage

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Rolling resistance

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Price/value

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

68%

Comfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Exterior noise

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Comfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Interior noise

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

98%

Dry

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Dry braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Dry handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Ice

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Ice braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best ice tyres Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs Kleber KRISALP HP3

Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert

Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

MS plus 77

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison