18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
19
3
4
14
1
Best position
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
11.2
3.7
3.3
3.6
1.0
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
76
36
40
194
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet performance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Snow
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Costs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Rolling resistance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Price/value
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Interior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Ice
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store