18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
19
14
4
3
5
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
11.2
3.6
3.3
3.7
2.8
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
76
194
40
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet performance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Snow
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Snow traction
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Snow braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Snow handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Costs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Mileage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Rolling resistance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Price/value
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Interior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dry
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Ice
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store