Segment
1. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost2. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Tristar Ice-Plus S210 vs. Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen winter tyres are slightly better rated (34%) than Tristar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Tristar Ice-Plus S210 and Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Tristar Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 215/60 R17 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the WinGuard Sport 2 SUV were tested.
| # | Tristar Ice-Plus S210
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Rating: Not recommended | 4+ | 2 | 3- | ||||
| Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 SUV Rating: Not recommended | 3 | 3+ | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
