Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Toyo summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Vredestein (30%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Pro has a better rating of 72% compared to 65% of the Toyo Proxes Sport 2. The first tyre test of Toyo Proxes Sport 2 was done in 2023, compared to 2024 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Proxes Sport 2 and the Ultrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Toyo Proxes Sport 2
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R18 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Upper-middle
2. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 10.29
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 | 34.6 | 29.5 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 34.2 | 28.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: - | 228 | 104 | 124 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||