18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Test Profile

Toyo
Celsius
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
Quatrac
Number of tests
7
10
16
Best position
#7
#2
#1
Average position
12.9
6.0
3.1
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
Available sizes
75
109
88

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
87%
Wet braking
Toyo Celsius
49%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Celsius
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Wet handling
Toyo Celsius
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein Quatrac
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Celsius
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Celsius
46%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Snow
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
Snow traction
Toyo Celsius
70%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Snow braking
Toyo Celsius
77%
Vredestein Quatrac
84%
Snow handling
Toyo Celsius
69%
Vredestein Quatrac
83%
Snow cornering
Toyo Celsius
55%
Vredestein Quatrac
74%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein Quatrac
82%
Dry handling
Toyo Celsius
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein Quatrac
81%
Dry braking
Toyo Celsius
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Vredestein Quatrac
79%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein Quatrac
88%
Exterior noise
Toyo Celsius
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Vredestein Quatrac
86%
Comfort
Toyo Celsius
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Vredestein Quatrac
78%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Vredestein Quatrac
67%
Rolling resistance
Toyo Celsius
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Vredestein Quatrac
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store