18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Toyo
Celsius
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
7
10
5
Best position
#7
#2
#1
Average position
12.9
6.0
2.8
Latest test
2022
2026
2026
Available sizes
75
109
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet handling
Toyo Celsius
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet braking
Toyo Celsius
49%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Celsius
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Celsius
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Celsius
46%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Toyo Celsius
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Toyo Celsius
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Toyo Celsius
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Toyo Celsius
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store