Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Upper-middle

Toyo

Celsius

R14 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Quatrac

Number of tests

7

10

4

16

Best position

#7

#2

#1

Average position

12.9

6.0

3.3

3.1

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

75

109

40

88

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Wet braking

Toyo Celsius

49%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Celsius

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Wet handling

Toyo Celsius

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Celsius

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Celsius

46%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Snow

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Snow traction

Toyo Celsius

70%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Snow braking

Toyo Celsius

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Snow handling

Toyo Celsius

69%

Vredestein Quatrac

83%

Snow cornering

Toyo Celsius

55%

Vredestein Quatrac

74%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Dry braking

Toyo Celsius

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Dry handling

Toyo Celsius

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Exterior noise

Toyo Celsius

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Comfort

Toyo Celsius

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Rolling resistance

Toyo Celsius

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres on snow Tyres for EV cars Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Toyo Celsius vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Toyo Celsius vs CST Medallion MD-A1

Toyo Celsius vs Maxxis Mecotra 3

Toyo Celsius vs Vredestein Quatrac 5

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kumho Ecsta HS51

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Quatrac

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison