Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

Toyo

Celsius

R14 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

7

10

4

3

1

Best position

#7

#2

#1

Average position

12.9

6.0

3.3

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

75

109

40

36

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Toyo Celsius

49%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Celsius

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

Toyo Celsius

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Celsius

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Celsius

46%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

Toyo Celsius

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Toyo Celsius

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Toyo Celsius

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Toyo Celsius

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Toyo Celsius vs Continental AllSeasonContact

Toyo Celsius vs Michelin CrossClimate+

Toyo Celsius vs Nokian WeatherProof

Toyo Celsius vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison