18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Toyo
Celsius
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
7
10
6
3
Best position
#7
#2
#3
#2
Average position
12.9
6.0
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2022
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
75
109
146
36
Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Toyo Celsius
49%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Celsius
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Toyo Celsius
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Celsius
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Celsius
46%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Toyo Celsius
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Toyo Celsius
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Toyo Celsius
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Toyo Celsius
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store