18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Toyo
Celsius
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
7
10
3
Best position
#7
#2
#2
Average position
12.9
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2022
2026
2025
Available sizes
75
109
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Toyo Celsius
49%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Celsius
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Toyo Celsius
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Celsius
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Celsius
46%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Toyo Celsius
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Toyo Celsius
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Toyo Celsius
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Toyo Celsius
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store