Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Toyo

Celsius

R14 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Also compare with

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

7

10

14

4

Best position

#7

#2

#8

#2

Average position

12.9

6.0

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2022

2026

Available sizes

75

109

153

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Wet braking

Toyo Celsius

49%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Celsius

56%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet handling

Toyo Celsius

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Celsius

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Celsius

46%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dry

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry braking

Toyo Celsius

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Dry handling

Toyo Celsius

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

Toyo Celsius

66%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

Toyo Celsius

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Costs

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

Toyo Celsius

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Toyo Celsius vs Continental AllSeasonContact

Toyo Celsius vs Michelin CrossClimate+

Toyo Celsius vs Nokian WeatherProof

Toyo Celsius vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Celsius

Ecsta HS52

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison