Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Toyo

Celsius

R14 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Kleber

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Celsius

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

7

11

4

1

3

Best position

#7

#1

#2

#1

#2

Average position

12.9

11.6

3.3

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2022

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

75

122

40

66

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Toyo Celsius

49%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Celsius

56%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Toyo Celsius

51%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Celsius

72%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Celsius

46%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Toyo Celsius

61%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Toyo Celsius

71%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Toyo Celsius

66%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Toyo Celsius

53%

Kleber Dynaxer HP4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Toyo Celsius vs Continental AllSeasonContact

Toyo Celsius vs Michelin CrossClimate+

Toyo Celsius vs Nokian WeatherProof

Toyo Celsius vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HM

Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Browse by brand

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Celsius

Dynaxer HP4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison