18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. CST Medallion MD-A1 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Toyo
Celsius
CST
Medallion MD-A1
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
7
2
3
3
Best position
#7
#10
#2
#1
Average position
12.9
21.5
3.7
1.3
Latest test
2022
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
75
264
36
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Wet braking
Toyo Celsius
49%
CST Medallion MD-A1
29%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Celsius
56%
CST Medallion MD-A1
99%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Wet handling
Toyo Celsius
51%
CST Medallion MD-A1
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Celsius
72%
CST Medallion MD-A1
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Dry handling
Toyo Celsius
71%
CST Medallion MD-A1
95%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Dry braking
Toyo Celsius
61%
CST Medallion MD-A1
22%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Exterior noise
Toyo Celsius
66%
CST Medallion MD-A1
100%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Rolling resistance
Toyo Celsius
53%
CST Medallion MD-A1
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store