18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Toyo CelsiusUpper-middle
ToyoToyo

Celsius

R14 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Toyo
Celsius
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
7
14
10
3
Best position
#7
#8
#2
#2
Average position
12.9
13.4
6.0
3.7
Latest test
2022
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
75
153
109
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Celsius
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
Toyo Celsius
51%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet braking
Toyo Celsius
49%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Celsius
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Celsius
46%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Toyo Celsius
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Toyo Celsius
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Toyo Celsius
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Toyo Celsius
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Toyo Celsius
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Toyo Celsius
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Toyo Celsius
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyresBest tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Toyo Celsius vs Continental AllSeasonContactToyo Celsius vs Michelin CrossClimate+Toyo Celsius vs Nokian WeatherProofToyo Celsius vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNBFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone RoadhawkBFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store