Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Toyo

Celsius

R14 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Celsius

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Number of tests

7

14

3

Best position

#7

#8

#1

#2

Average position

12.9

13.4

1.3

3.7

Latest test

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

75

153

23

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Toyo Celsius

49%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Celsius

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Toyo Celsius

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Celsius

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet side guide

Toyo Celsius

60%

BFGoodrich Advantage

54%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Celsius

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

Toyo Celsius

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry braking

Toyo Celsius

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry lane changing

Toyo Celsius

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dry steering response

Toyo Celsius

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Comfort

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Toyo Celsius

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Toyo Celsius

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Costs

Confidence

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Toyo Celsius

53%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best snow tyres Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Toyo Celsius vs Continental AllSeasonContact

Toyo Celsius vs Michelin CrossClimate+

Toyo Celsius vs Nokian WeatherProof

Toyo Celsius vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Celsius

Advantage

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison