18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Firestone Multiseason 2 vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Short comparison: the Toyo Celsius AS2 (54%) and the Firestone Multiseason 2 (56%) are both positioned as all‑round / multiseason solutions, but tests show they follow different priorities. Neither model has a listed direct replacement at the time of testing.


Test positions and overall result: across the available test programmes (AUTOBILD, ADAC and other lab comparisons) the Firestone generally ranks marginally ahead. Example placements: AUTOBILD/ADAC runs show Firestone at positions like 11–22 and ADAC 8/16, while Toyo sits around 11–12/16 or lower in larger AUTOBILD fields. Combined with the small difference in our aggregate scores (56% vs 54%), the Firestone Multiseason 2 is the overall winner by a narrow margin.


What the tests say — strengths


  • Toyo Celsius AS2 – praised repeatedly for high mileage, very good price/value and comfortable ride with low exterior noise. Several tests highlight strong aquaplaning resistance and long wear life, making it a good choice if you prioritise economy and comfort.

  • Firestone Multiseason 2 – scores best for wet handling, very good snow grip and consistently low rolling resistance. Tests note excellent behaviour on wet laps and strong performance in snow tests, which helps fuel efficiency and winter safety.


What the tests say — weaknesses


  • Toyo Celsius AS2 – several test reports point to average winter qualities, understeer on snow and wet surfaces, delayed steering response on wet roads and prolonged wet braking distances. If winter handling precision and shortest wet braking are priorities, Toyo shows limits.

  • Firestone Multiseason 2 – despite its wet and snow strengths, Firestone is criticised for extended dry braking distances, slightly below‑average comfort and mixed notes on aquaplaning reserves in some tests. Some test years also reported inconsistent treadwear/longevity.


Head‑to‑head summary: On pure safety metrics for wet and snowy conditions the Firestone pulls ahead thanks to better wet handling and superior snow grip, while the Toyo wins on cost‑per‑kilometre, comfort and aquaplaning reserves. In mixed real‑world use the Firestone’s strength on wet and snow combined with lower rolling resistance makes it the more balanced performer overall; the Toyo is the better value and longer‑lasting option if you prioritise mileage and ride comfort.


Verdict: choose the Firestone Multiseason 2 if you want the slightly better all‑round safety in wet and snowy conditions and lower rolling resistance. Opt for the Toyo Celsius AS2 if your priorities are longevity, price/value and comfort and you can accept modest compromises in wet braking and winter handling.


Manufacturer pages: Firestone and Toyo.

Test Profile

Toyo
Celsius AS2
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Number of tests
14
13
9
Best position
#7
#6
#5
Average position
11.6
10.9
10.8
Latest test
2025
2025
2023
Available sizes
109
61
73

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Toyo Celsius AS2
65%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Firestone Multiseason 2
66%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
64%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Wet Braking
Toyo Celsius AS2
51%
Firestone Multiseason 2
74%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
58%
Wet Handling
Toyo Celsius AS2
52%
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
76%
Wet Circle Cornering
Toyo Celsius AS2
56%
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Toyo Celsius AS2
78%
Firestone Multiseason 2
58%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
52%
Aquaplaning Cross
Toyo Celsius AS2
90%
Firestone Multiseason 2
55%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
51%
Dry Performance
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
66%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Dry Braking
Toyo Celsius AS2
67%
Firestone Multiseason 2
55%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Dry Handling
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
72%
Snow Performance
Toyo Celsius AS2
67%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
75%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Snow Braking
Toyo Celsius AS2
77%
Firestone Multiseason 2
81%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
85%
Snow Traction
Toyo Celsius AS2
60%
Firestone Multiseason 2
77%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
81%
Snow Handling
Toyo Celsius AS2
64%
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
72%
Snow Circle Cornering
Toyo Celsius AS2
66%
Firestone Multiseason 2
56%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
62%
Comfort & Noise
Toyo Celsius AS2
71%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Firestone Multiseason 2
64%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
69%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Noise Exterior
Toyo Celsius AS2
68%
Firestone Multiseason 2
72%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
82%
Ride Comfort
Toyo Celsius AS2
73%
Firestone Multiseason 2
56%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
56%
Economy
Toyo Celsius AS2
78%
Toyo
Celsius AS2
Firestone Multiseason 2
76%
Firestone
Multiseason 2
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
66%
Kumho
HA32 Solus 4S
Rolling Resistance
Toyo Celsius AS2
67%
Firestone Multiseason 2
92%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
59%
Mileage
Toyo Celsius AS2
88%
Firestone Multiseason 2
60%
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
72%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
All season
2023225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
All season
2022195/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison